Visitor asks before acting
Note three requests and decide whether each response allows, refuses or adds a condition.
Ask before acting, respond politely and explain simple rules so everyone knows what is allowed.
For learners: Ask before acting, understand what is allowed and respond clearly in shared places.
For teachers: The route moves from permission meaning to form, repair, a three-rule plan, listening across two accents and an independent exchange.
สำหรับผู้เรียน: ฝึกขออนุญาตก่อนลงมือ เข้าใจว่าสิ่งใดทำได้หรือทำไม่ได้ และตอบให้ชัดเจนในพื้นที่ที่ใช้ร่วมกัน
สำหรับครู: เส้นทางเริ่มจากความหมายของการอนุญาต ไปสู่รูปประโยค การแก้ข้อความ การวางแผนกฎสามข้อ การฟังสองสำเนียง และการสนทนาด้วยตนเอง
Ask three Can I…? questions, give three clear permission responses, explain three simple rules and improve one unclear or overly direct response.
ถามขออนุญาตด้วย Can I…? จำนวน 3 ข้อ ตอบอนุญาตหรือปฏิเสธอย่างชัดเจน 3 ครั้ง อธิบายกฎง่าย ๆ 3 ข้อ และปรับคำตอบที่ไม่ชัดหรือฟังห้วนเกินไปหนึ่งจุด
Permission language protects relationships and prevents mistakes. The listener needs to hear immediately whether an action is allowed, not allowed or still needs approval.
ภาษาไทย: ภาษาสำหรับขออนุญาตช่วยรักษาความสัมพันธ์และป้องกันความผิดพลาด ผู้ฟังต้องเข้าใจได้ทันทีว่าทำสิ่งนั้นได้ ทำไม่ได้ หรือยังต้องรอการอนุมัติ
Ask “What does the listener understand: ask, allow, refuse or rule?” before naming can or can’t. Preserve the intended permission status during every repair.
| Stage | Teacher move | Evidence to collect |
|---|---|---|
| 1 · Meaning | Sort messages by permission function before showing the form. | Eight meaning decisions |
| 2 · Form | Build request, permission, refusal and rule patterns. | Eight accurate patterns |
| 3 · Repair | Keep the permission status while making the message clear and suitable. | Six repairs + reasons |
| 4 · Plan | Map three rules and a useful reason for one real place. | Three-rule situation map |
| 5 · Check | Use two accents to decide the permission status and clarify one condition. | Two listening maps + clarification |
| 6 · Perform | Score the first exchanges, target one weakness and retry it. | Independent permission task |
Decide whether each message asks, allows, refuses or states a rule before choosing can or can’t.
| Situation | Message meaning | Listener’s next move |
|---|---|---|
| A visitor points to an empty desk. | asks to use the desk | wait for an answer |
| The host says the visitor may sit there. | allows the action | use the desk |
| The host says the room is reserved. | refuses and gives a reason | choose another room |
| Food is not permitted near the computers. | states a rule | keep food outside |
| A learner points to the window. | asks before opening it | wait for an answer |
| The teacher offers the side entrance. | allows an alternative | use the side entrance |
Do not introduce can/can’t as labels first. Establish the speaker’s purpose and the permission status. Ask “Can the person act now?” If the answer is uncertain, the message is a request or needs clarification.
Match each permission function to a short, clear pattern and a suitable tone.
| Function | Pattern | Useful example |
|---|---|---|
| ask permission | Can I + base verb…? | Can I open the window? |
| allow | Yes, you can. / You can + base verb. | Yes, you can use this desk. |
| refuse politely | Sorry, you can’t + base verb + reason. | Sorry, you can’t enter yet. The room is in use. |
| state an allowed rule | You can + base verb… | You can leave your bag here. |
| state a prohibited rule | You can’t + base verb… | You can’t bring drinks near the computers. |
Can + base verb stays the same with I, you, he, she, it, we and they. A question places can before the subject. A statement places the subject before can or can’t.
Stress can’t clearly when the rule is negative; add a short reason or alternative when a bare refusal sounds harsh.
Can I wait here? · Yes, you can. · Sorry, you can’t wait here. · You can wait by the entrance.
Keep examples short enough to hear the contrast. Do not add -s after can. If can’t is unclear, slow the whole phrase and contrast “You can use it” with “You can’t use it,” then return to natural speed.
Preserve the permission meaning while repairing word order, verb form or an unnecessarily harsh response.
| Intended meaning and message | Problem | Meaning-preserving repair |
|---|---|---|
| Ask: I can use this chair? | statement order hides the request | Can I use this chair? |
| Allow: Yes, you can to sit here. | to after can | Yes, you can sit here. |
| Refuse politely: No. You can’t. | action and reason are missing | Sorry, you can’t park here. This space is reserved. |
| Rule: You can bringing drinks. | -ing after can | You can bring drinks. |
| Prohibited rule: You don’t can enter. | wrong negative pattern | You can’t enter. |
| Allow an alternative: You can’t use Room A. | correct but not helpful enough | You can’t use Room A, but you can use Room B. |
Question order: Can I…? · base verb after can/can’t · polite refusal: Sorry + can’t + action + short reason · helpful alternative: but you can…
Never reward a grammatically correct repair that reverses the intended permission. Repair in this order: permission status, request/statement order, base verb, then tone. A reason should be short and truthful; an alternative is useful but not always necessary.
Plan one real place with an allowed action, a prohibited action and a useful reason or alternative.
| Rule slot | Permission message | Reason or alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Allowed action | You can use the desks near the window. | They are available for visitors. |
| Prohibited action | You can’t take drinks to the computers. | You can leave your drink on this table. |
| Ask-before-action | Can I open the equipment cupboard? | A staff member needs to help. |
Reject vague rules such as “You can’t do that.” Require a visible action and place. Check that each planned rule has a real purpose and that the alternative does not accidentally contradict the prohibition.
Identify permission status in two accents, then clarify one uncertain action, condition or alternative.
Note three requests and decide whether each response allows, refuses or adds a condition.
Recover three rules, one reason and one useful alternative, then find one detail that needs clarification.
Audio never starts automatically. Use Amy first and Matthew for accent transfer. Make learners record the action and status together; “computers—not allowed” is not enough. If can and can’t are confused, replay the whole response and use the reason or alternative as meaning evidence.
Complete an independent permission exchange and improve one precise meaning, form or interaction weakness.
Result: 0–2 Rebuild · 3–4 Developing · 5–6 A1 mastery evidence.
Score the first independent task across MEAN, FORM and USE. Give one target only: “make the status clear,” “use question order,” “keep the base verb,” “stress can’t,” “add a short reason” or “offer an alternative.” Keep the first score and record whether the focused retry improves it.
You can now ask before acting, give or refuse permission clearly, explain three simple rules and clarify one condition or alternative. Use the Dynamic Learning Graph below for the next step.
Return to the Learning LibraryBuild reliable action forms first
ทบทวนรูปกริยาสำหรับการกระทำให้แม่นก่อน
Use permission meaning in a safety warning
นำความหมายการอนุญาตไปใช้กับคำเตือนด้านความปลอดภัย
Turn clear rules into step-by-step instructions
ต่อยอดจากกฎที่ชัดเจนสู่คำแนะนำทีละขั้น
Move to stronger obligation with must and have to
ต่อยอดสู่การบอกหน้าที่ด้วย must และ have to