Report evidence
According to the case…
The source states that…
B2 · Explain, evaluate, clarify, and agree
For learners: Explain a health situation, evaluate evidence, compare options, clarify uncertainty and agree on a safe next action without diagnosing.
For teachers: The lesson integrates listening, source reading, evidence classification, modal comparison, roleplay clarification and an independent decision task.
สำหรับผู้เรียน: อธิบายสถานการณ์สุขภาพ ประเมินหลักฐาน เปรียบเทียบทางเลือก ถามย้ำความไม่แน่นอน และตกลงขั้นตอนถัดไปที่ปลอดภัยโดยไม่วินิจฉัย
สำหรับครู: บทเรียนผสานการฟัง การอ่านแหล่งข้อมูล การแยกประเภทหลักฐาน การใช้ modal เปรียบเทียบ การถามย้ำแบบบทบาทสมมติ และภารกิจตัดสินใจอิสระ
Explain a health situation, separate evidence from unsupported claims, compare options, ask focused clarification questions, and agree on a safe next action.
EN: A responsible health conversation combines listening, evidence checking, cautious language, clarification, and a practical next step. The goal is not to sound certain; it is to make the limits of the evidence clear.
TH: การสื่อสารเรื่องสุขภาพอย่างรับผิดชอบต้องฟังให้ครบ แยกหลักฐานออกจากข้อกล่าวอ้าง ใช้ภาษาอย่างระมัดระวัง ถามย้ำ และตกลงขั้นตอนต่อไป โดยไม่วินิจฉัยหรือแนะนำยาเอง
Keep the task communicative and evidence-based. Do not diagnose, prescribe, or ask the learner to share private medical information. In Final Practice, play Audio 2 twice and do not supply decision language until the independent response is complete.
| Time | Teacher does | Student does | Required evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–3 | Activates cautious claim and clarification language. | Recalls one evidence phrase and one uncertainty phrase. | Two usable sentence stems. |
| 3–7 | Plays Audio 1 twice; keeps transcript closed. | Identifies the situation, proposed option, and uncertainty. | A neutral case summary. |
| 7–12 | Reveals source facts and challenges unsupported claims. | Sorts case facts, source facts, claims, and missing information. | Four correctly labelled items. |
| 12–17 | Asks for benefits, risks, evidence, and urgency. | Compares three options without diagnosing. | An evidence-based comparison. |
| 17–23 | Roleplays a pharmacist or clinic contact. | Explains the case, asks focused questions, and confirms the next action. | A clear professional exchange. |
| 23–30 | Plays unseen Audio 2 twice and observes. | Explains, evaluates, rejects an unsupported option, and confirms action. | Independent mixed-skill performance. |
Use language that shows what is known, what is uncertain, and what must be checked.
According to the case…
The source states that…
This may suggest…, but it does not prove…
We cannot tell from the symptoms alone.
What would make this more urgent?
Could you confirm the safest next step?
Keep this to three minutes. Accept accurate alternatives, but ask the learner to replace absolute language such as “This definitely means…” with a calibrated phrase.
Listen for facts, a proposed option, and the speaker’s decision problem.
First listening: situation and purpose. Second listening: timeline, present signs, proposed option, and uncertainty.
Play once for situation and purpose, pause for a 20-second summary, then play once for details. Allow one replay only if the learner can name the missing detail. Do not discuss treatment yet.
Evidence is only useful when you label its source and limits.
Sore throat and runny nose for three days; brief feverish feeling on day one; no fever now; breathing normally; no professional consultation yet.
Antibiotics do not work against viruses. Do not take antibiotics prescribed for someone else or save them for later. A healthcare professional can advise on the best treatment.
Ask “Where did that information come from?” and “What does it fail to prove?” Reward accurate source language. Stop any attempt to identify the illness.
A strong comparison includes evidence, uncertainty, possible harm, and urgency.
| Option | Evidence and benefit | Risk or limit | Decision language |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use the friend’s leftover antibiotics | No qualified assessment supports this option. | Wrong medicine may delay correct care and cause side effects. | I would reject this option because it is unsupported and unsafe. |
| Use general self-care and monitor | Rest and fluids are common supportive steps for cold-like symptoms. | This does not identify the cause; risk factors and worsening symptoms matter. | This may be reasonable while the speaker monitors the situation and seeks advice if concerned. |
| Contact a pharmacist or healthcare provider | A professional can consider symptoms, history, risk factors, and other medicines. | The learner must explain the case clearly and ask focused questions. | This is the safest way to clarify medicine questions and the next step. |
Require the learner to explain why, not just choose. If they give a treatment instruction, redirect: “How could you turn that into a question for a qualified professional?”
Turn the decision into a short, responsible conversation.
I have had a sore throat and runny nose for three days. The brief feverish feeling has stopped, and I am breathing normally.
What information do you need before advising me? What warning signs should change the plan?
So the next step is to avoid the leftover medicine, follow general care advice, and contact a professional if the situation changes—is that correct?
Ask for timeline, present signs, risk factors, and medicines only as fictional case information. Do not improvise medical advice. Prompt once with “What still needs checking?” then let the learner repair and confirm.
Complete the full sequence with a new message and no model language.
Listen twice before opening the transcript.
Score only the independent Final Practice.
Play Audio 2 twice. Allow one neutral replay only; do not supply vocabulary or the decision. Expected evidence includes symptoms improving then worsening, fever for five days, asthma, no current chest pain or breathing difficulty, rejection of another person’s medicine, and prompt professional contact. If the case included chest pain or trouble breathing, the learner should identify the need for emergency medical help.
EN: Record a 60-second decision summary using the route: situation → evidence → rejected option → missing information → next action → condition for changing the action.
TH: อัดเสียงสรุปการตัดสินใจ 60 วินาทีตามลำดับ: สถานการณ์ → หลักฐาน → ตัวเลือกที่ปฏิเสธ → ข้อมูลที่ยังขาด → ขั้นตอนถัดไป → เงื่อนไขที่ทำให้ต้องเปลี่ยนแผน
บทนี้ไม่ได้สอนให้วินิจฉัยโรค แต่สอนให้บอกข้อมูลตามเวลา แยกข้อเท็จจริงออกจากคำกล่าวอ้าง เปรียบเทียบความเสี่ยง ถามผู้เชี่ยวชาญ และยืนยันขั้นตอนถัดไป หากมีอาการฉุกเฉิน เช่น หายใจลำบากหรือเจ็บหน้าอก ต้องขอความช่วยเหลือฉุกเฉินในพื้นที่
Review how to identify the problem, advice and next action
ทบทวนการจับปัญหา คำแนะนำ และขั้นตอนถัดไป
Compare options with appropriate certainty and care
เปรียบเทียบทางเลือกด้วยระดับความแน่ใจและความระมัดระวังที่เหมาะสม
Separate claims, evidence and limitations in a health text
แยกข้อกล่าวอ้าง หลักฐาน และข้อจำกัดในบทอ่านสุขภาพ
Explain the case and clarify the next step at an appointment
อธิบายกรณีและถามย้ำขั้นตอนถัดไปในการนัดหมาย
CDC — Manage Common Cold and CDC — Antibiotic Do’s and Don’ts. These sources support the fictional evidence cards about supportive care, reasons to seek medical care, antibiotics not treating viruses, and not using another person’s or leftover antibiotics. This lesson teaches English communication and does not replace professional medical advice.
© 2026 Engduo Thailand. Authorized Engduo use only. Copying, republishing, reselling, scraping, or reuse in another course, dataset, product, or AI system requires written permission except where applicable law permits.