PROF · 1–3
1 Tone or wording creates friction or uncertainty.
2 Mostly clear and professional, with some unnecessary wording.
3 Concise, polite, constructive and appropriate throughout.
Clarify an unclear work request, ask connected follow-up questions, confirm scope, ownership and deadline, then adapt the plan when conditions change.
Topic Family TF19 · Meetings, Projects & Decisions
Turn an unclear work request into a shared action plan by asking connected questions, confirming the agreement and adapting when conditions change.
For learners: Clarify an unclear work request, confirm scope, priority, ownership and deadline, then adapt the agreed plan when conditions change.
For teachers: The lesson moves from noticing information gaps to functional language, connected follow-up questions, an accurate close, a changed condition and an independent roleplay with focused retry.
สำหรับผู้เรียน: ฝึกรับงานที่กำกวมให้ชัดเจน ยืนยันขอบเขต ลำดับความสำคัญ ผู้รับผิดชอบและกำหนดส่ง แล้วปรับแผนเมื่อเงื่อนไขเปลี่ยน
สำหรับครู: ลำดับจากการมองหาข้อมูลที่ขาด เลือกภาษาตามหน้าที่ ถามต่อจากคำตอบ ทวนข้อตกลง รับมือเงื่อนไขใหม่ และจบด้วยสถานการณ์จำลองพร้อมแก้จุดอ่อน
By the end of this lesson, you can clarify an unclear work request, confirm scope, priority, format, ownership and deadline, then summarise the agreed next steps without relying on a script.
ถามให้งานชัดเจน ยืนยันขอบเขต ลำดับความสำคัญ รูปแบบ ผู้รับผิดชอบ และกำหนดส่ง ก่อนสรุปสิ่งที่ตกลงกันได้ด้วยตนเอง
Many workplace mistakes begin before the work starts: people accept an unclear request, silently guess the missing details and discover the mismatch too late. This lesson trains you to clarify early and close the conversation with an actionable plan.
บทเรียนนี้ไม่ได้วัดเพียงว่าจำประโยคได้หรือไม่ แต่ตรวจว่าสามารถค้นหาข้อมูลที่ขาด ปรับคำถามตามคำตอบ และสรุปข้อตกลงที่นำไปทำงานต่อได้จริงหรือไม่
| Stage | Teacher move | Learner evidence |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Show one incomplete task request. Ask what is still unknown. | Identifies at least four missing details. |
| 2 | Group phrases by communication purpose, not grammar label. | Selects phrases for scope, priority, deadline and confirmation. |
| 3 | Answer only the question asked and leave one detail incomplete. | Builds the next question from the previous answer. |
| 4 | Ask for a three-part close. | States deliverable, owner and deadline accurately. |
| 5 | Add one realistic changed condition. | Renegotiates one detail and updates the summary. |
| 6 | Run independently, score, give one target and retry. | Completes the clarification cycle without a script. |
Separate what you know from what you still need to clarify.
Think: Which missing detail could create the biggest problem if you guessed?
Ask the learner to identify at least four genuine gaps before offering language. Prioritise gaps that could change the deliverable or deadline.
Which sections would you like me to update?
When you say clearer, do you mean shorter or more detailed?
Which part should I prioritise?
Is accuracy or speed more important for this version?
What time do you need the first draft?
Would you like the full report or a one-page summary?
Let me confirm the next steps.
I’ll … by …, and you’ll … before …
Language freedom rule: Replace any phrase with natural language that performs the same function. You do not need to use every phrase.
Check meaning, tone and purpose. Ask the learner to choose one useful phrase per function, then close the page or hide the models before speaking.
Success evidence: Ask at least one connected follow-up instead of reading a prepared list of questions.
Answer only what was asked. Give enough information to support a natural follow-up, but do not volunteer every missing detail.
Accuracy check: Can the other person repeat what will be produced, who acts next and when each action is due?
Do not reward a fluent close if one agreed fact is wrong. Ask the learner to correct only the inaccurate or missing element.
“The client has moved the meeting forward. We now need something by noon, but the finance figures will not be ready until 2 p.m.”
The learner must acknowledge the constraint, identify what can still be delivered, propose an alternative and confirm the revised plan.
Accept another solution when it protects the purpose and makes the trade-off explicit. Focus feedback on whether the revised agreement is actionable.
Task: Clarify the request and close with an accurate action summary. After the first agreement, respond to one changed condition from the teacher.
Success: The listener can state the scope, priority, owner, timing and next action without guessing.
1 Tone or wording creates friction or uncertainty.
2 Mostly clear and professional, with some unnecessary wording.
3 Concise, polite, constructive and appropriate throughout.
1 Reads prepared questions or needs the teacher to manage the exchange.
2 Uses one connected follow-up or adapts with support.
3 Listens, follows up, closes and renegotiates independently.
1 Important work details remain unclear.
2 Most details are clear, but one action, owner or deadline is incomplete.
3 Both people leave with the same complete, actionable plan.
Target: Aim for at least 8/9 with FP = 3.
Feedback + improved retry: Keep the first score, choose one missed element and rerun only the weakest part of the conversation.
Do not supply wording during the first performance. Score PROF, CM and FP separately, give one precise improvement point and run a short focused retry.
Task Clarifier — Clarify a work request and confirm the next steps.
Teacher status: Still practising · Can do with support · Can do independently · Can adapt when conditions change
Build ownership and responsibility language
เตรียมคำศัพท์เรื่องบทบาทและผู้รับผิดชอบ
Strengthen meeting and decision language
ต่อยอดภาษาสำหรับการประชุมและการตัดสินใจ
Explain problems, causes and solutions
ฝึกอธิบายปัญหา สาเหตุ และทางแก้
CEFR Companion Volume — action-oriented outcomes, goal-oriented co-operation and interaction strategies.
© 2026 Engduo Thailand. This lesson, instructional design and visual are produced for authorised Engduo use. The people shown in the cover are fictional illustrative subjects.