Project correction
Identify the corrected assumption, focused time, key need and action to avoid.

Move the listener’s attention to the person, time, reason or priority that changes the message.
For learners: Build B2 control of it-clefts and what-clefts to correct assumptions and prioritise information.
For teachers: Meaning-first six-stage route: focus choice, controlled forms, correction, dual-accent listening, final prioritised explanation and one focused retry.
สำหรับผู้เรียน: ฝึกใช้ it-cleft และ what-cleft ระดับ B2 เพื่อแก้ความเข้าใจผิดและชี้ข้อมูลสำคัญให้ผู้ฟังตัดสินใจหรือทำขั้นตอนต่อไปได้
สำหรับครู: เส้นทาง 6 ขั้นที่เริ่มจากความหมายและจุดเน้น ต่อด้วยรูปประโยค การแก้ความเข้าใจผิด การฟังสองสำเนียง การอธิบายลำดับความสำคัญ และการลองใหม่เฉพาะจุด
By the end of this lesson, you can create six cleft sentences, focus four information types, correct two assumptions, and deliver one clearly prioritised explanation.
สร้าง cleft sentence อย่างน้อย 6 ประโยค เพื่อย้ายจุดสนใจไปยังคน เวลา เหตุผล หรือสิ่งสำคัญ แก้ความเข้าใจผิด 2 จุด และอธิบายลำดับความสำคัญให้ผู้ฟังจับประเด็นได้ทันที
A neutral sentence reports an event. A cleft sentence tells the listener which part deserves attention: “Mina found the error” becomes “It was Mina who found the error.” Use the structure only when focus changes the listener’s decision, understanding or next action.
ภาษาไทย: ประโยคธรรมดารายงานเหตุการณ์ แต่ cleft sentence ชี้ว่าข้อมูลส่วนใดสำคัญ เช่น เน้นว่าเป็น Mina ไม่ใช่คนอื่น ใช้เมื่อจุดเน้นช่วยแก้ความเข้าใจผิดหรือทำให้ผู้ฟังตัดสินใจและทำขั้นตอนต่อไปได้ชัดขึ้น
Ask “What must the listener notice?” before naming the structure. The learner earns credit only when the cleft changes information focus and the rest of the explanation stays natural.
| Stage | Teacher move | Evidence to collect |
|---|---|---|
| 1 · Meaning | Contrast neutral reporting with four useful information-focus choices. | Six focus maps |
| 2 · It-cleft | Build person, time, place and reason focus with accurate agreement. | Six controlled it-clefts |
| 3 · What-cleft | Highlight needs, causes, priorities and desired actions. | Six structure decisions |
| 4 · Correction | Repair two assumptions and return to natural non-cleft support. | Two complete correction turns |
| 5 · Listening | Recover focus and communicative purpose across two accents. | Two listening maps + two retells |
| 6 · Perform | Score MEAN/FORM/USE and target one focus, form or use retry. | Prioritised explanation + retry |
Do not change the sentence until you can name the contrast.
| Neutral message | Possible focus | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Mina found the error on Tuesday. | person · time | correct who found it or when |
| The team met in Chiang Mai because travel was easier. | place · reason | correct the location or explain the choice |
| We need a verified total before approval. | priority | guide the next action |
| The delayed reply caused the complaint. | cause | separate cause from symptom |
Give the same neutral sentence to two partners and assign different assumptions. This makes the focus choice visible: grammar follows the communicative contrast, not the topic word the learner happens to like.
Use an it-cleft when one detail answers “exactly who, when, where or why?”
| Focus | Controlled pattern | Model |
|---|---|---|
| person | It is/was + person + who/that + clause | It was Mina who found the error. |
| time | It is/was + time + that + clause | It was on Tuesday that Mina found it. |
| place | It is/was + place + that + clause | It was in Chiang Mai that the team met. |
| reason | It is/was + reason + that + clause | It was because travel was easier that we chose the city. |
The focused element follows it is/was. Use who for people when natural and that for things, time, place or reason. The remaining clause must still express the original relationship without repeating the focused noun as a new subject.
Back-transform each cleft into its neutral sentence. If meaning, tense or participant changes, repair the clause before working on stress. Do not accept “It was Mina who she found the error.”
Choose what + clause when the listener needs a need, cause, priority, result or desired action.
| Communicative job | What-cleft | Focused message |
|---|---|---|
| state a need | What we need is a verified total. | required resource |
| identify a cause | What caused the complaint was the delayed reply. | real cause |
| rank a priority | What matters most is protecting the customer’s data. | decision criterion |
| request action | next action |
Use an it-cleft to identify or correct a specific detail already in the event. Use a what-cleft to announce the main need, cause, priority, result or action. If no contrast is useful, use a neutral sentence.
Keep the what-clause short enough to process. If the learner builds a long abstract subject, ask for the decision first: “What matters most is X.” Add evidence in a normal sentence afterwards.
Focus one corrected detail, add evidence, then return to normal sentence order.
| Assumption to repair | Required focus | Evidence and close |
|---|---|---|
| The team sent the file on Thursday. | time correction with an it-cleft | timestamp + confirmation action |
| The design caused the delay. | real cause with a what-cleft | one fact + next priority |
Stop learners who use a cleft in every sentence. The contrastive sentence should stand out against ordinary supporting language. Evaluate whether the listener can repeat both the corrected assumption and the new priority.
Recover the neutral message, the highlighted information and the speaker’s reason for highlighting it.
Identify the corrected assumption, focused time, key need and action to avoid.
Track which details receive contrastive focus and what the listener should do next.
| Listening pass | Record | Transfer question |
|---|---|---|
| 1 · Situation | speaker, problem and neutral event | What is happening? |
| 2 · Focus | it-cleft/what-cleft + highlighted element | What must the listener notice? |
| 3 · Purpose | correction, priority or action | Why use a cleft here? |
Audio never starts automatically. Accent variety tests transfer, not imitation. Replay the focused sentence only, then ask for three answers: neutral event, highlighted element, communicative purpose.
Use a few well-chosen clefts inside a natural explanation, not a chain of display sentences.
Result: 0–2 Rebuild · 3–4 Developing · 5–6 B2 performance evidence.
Score the first independent explanation across MEAN, FORM and USE. Give one target only. Preserve the first score and record whether the retry makes the corrected fact or final priority easier to recover.
You can now choose a useful information focus, build accurate it-clefts and what-clefts, correct an assumption and make one priority clear without turning every sentence into a cleft. Continue through the Dynamic Learning Graph below to compare more advanced focus choices.
Return to Grammar LessonsLearn first
เรียนก่อน
Next step
ขั้นต่อไป
Review a simpler focus choice
ทบทวนการเลือกจุดเน้นแบบพื้นฐาน
See the C2 destination
ดูเป้าหมายระดับ C2