Listening: What Does the Community Need?
Listen for the problem, people, help and action
ฟังหาปัญหา ผู้ได้รับผลกระทบ ความช่วยเหลือ และการกระทำ
Explain a public problem, compare two practical responses and answer a follow-up question.

B1 · Explain, compare and answer
For learners: Community decisions need clear explanations of who is affected, how options work and what should be checked before choosing.
For teachers: The B1 route builds original cause, effect and comparison sentences before a two-option explanation, follow-up questions and an adapted recommendation.
สำหรับผู้เรียน: การตัดสินใจของชุมชนต้องอธิบายให้ชัดว่าใครได้รับผลกระทบ ทางเลือกทำงานอย่างไร และควรตรวจอะไรเพิ่มเติมก่อนเลือก
สำหรับครู: ลำดับ B1 ให้ผู้เรียนสร้างประโยคเหตุ ผล และการเปรียบเทียบของตนเอง ก่อนอธิบายสองทางเลือก ตอบคำถาม และปรับข้อเสนอ
Explain a public problem, compare two practical responses and answer a follow-up question.
อธิบายปัญหาสาธารณะ เปรียบเทียบทางแก้ที่ทำได้จริงสองแบบ และตอบคำถามต่อยอดได้
For the learner: Community decisions become clearer when you explain who is affected, compare practical effects and respond to questions.
For the teacher: The learner builds original sentences before a supported comparison, then adapts the recommendation when a new access constraint appears.
เหตุผลภาษาไทย: ผู้เรียนฝึกอธิบายปัญหา เปรียบเทียบผลของทางเลือก และปรับข้อเสนอเมื่อมีเงื่อนไขใหม่ โดยไม่ท่องสคริปต์
This is a speaking lesson. Keep learner talk time above 70%. Use the model only after the learner builds a first comparison; never turn it into a script.
| Time | Teacher does | Student does | Required result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–3 | Shows the crossing scenario and asks who is affected. | Frames the place, problem, people and goal. | One clear problem statement. |
| 3–8 | Guides a short language selection. | Personalises one line from each function. | Four original sentences. |
| 8–12 | Challenges cause, result and comparison choices. | Repairs four statements. | Accurate and proportionate claims. |
| 12–17 | Prompts six keywords, then removes models. | Gives a 45–60 second comparison. | Problem → options → choice. |
| 17–21 | Asks two follow-up questions after the full turn. | Answers with reasons and uncertainty. | Two relevant answers. |
| 21–27 | Adds one access constraint and changes the listener. | Updates the comparison and recommendation. | A meaningful adaptation. |
| 27–30 | Scores the first unsupported performance. | Performs and retries the weakest part. | COM / VR / FP scores. |
Start with the situation, not with your favourite solution.
A pedestrian crossing near a bus stop.
It is difficult to see at night.
Bus users, older people and wheelchair users.
Help people cross safely and keep the route accessible.
Ask “Where?”, “What happens?” and “Who is affected?” Do not introduce the options until the problem statement is clear.
Choose one useful line from each group, then change the details.
Connect the condition to the community effect.
Compare effect, cost and access.
Choose one option without hiding uncertainty.
Limit silent reading to two minutes. Elicit original sentences, correct one connector or comparison, then hide the models.
Keep causes, results and claims accurate.
| Sentence | What it does | Check or repair |
|---|---|---|
| The crossing is dark, so drivers may react late. | Cause → result | Keep the result after so. |
| Option A is safer. | Strong comparison | Say which evidence supports “safer,” or use could improve visibility. |
| Option B works by slowing traffic with planters. | Mechanism | Name how it works, not only its aim. |
| The planters solve the problem. | Complete claim | The planters may help slow traffic, but access must be checked. |
Ask “What evidence supports that?” If none is available, elicit could, may or a condition that must be checked.
Plan with six keywords only.
Place · people · effect
Mechanism · benefit · limit
Mechanism · benefit · limit
Main reason · one check
Our neighbourhood has one unsafe crossing near the bus stop. It is difficult to see at night, and older people need more time to cross. Option A adds a brighter pedestrian light and clearer road markings. It would make the crossing easier to see, but the equipment costs more and needs maintenance. Option B uses planters and warning signs to slow traffic. It may cost less, but the planters must leave enough space for wheelchair users. I would choose Option A because visibility is the main problem, although the community should confirm the maintenance cost first.
Require the first learner version before opening the audio. Afterwards, ask what structure they noticed, close the transcript and run a second attempt.
Finish your turn before the listener asks two questions.
Listen to the full turn first. If the learner invents evidence, ask “What could we say without that number?”
Keep the problem stable, but update the option or condition.
The footpath is narrow. Any planter layout must leave a clear route for wheelchair users and people with pushchairs.
The community can fund a small pilot now, but not a complete installation this month.
Add the two constraints only after the first version. Accept a revised, combined or conditional choice when the reasoning is clear.
Hide the page and use only six keywords.
No script. Six keywords only.
2: Problem, options, comparison and answer are connected clearly.
1: Meaning is mostly clear but one part needs a prompt.
0: The listener cannot follow the comparison or answer.
2: Uses accurate cause, effect, comparison, benefit and limitation language.
1: Uses some target language with repetition or one unclear link.
0: Target language is missing or changes the meaning.
2: Recommends, answers and adapts independently from keywords.
1: Completes the task with a neutral prompt or limited support.
0: Needs a model or cannot complete the adapted response.
Target: 5/6 overall, COM = 2 and no zero. Score the first unsupported performance, give one focused correction, then rerun only the weakest evidence.
Hide every model. Ask one unprepared question and add one new condition. Record the first score and the focused retry separately.
เริ่มจากอธิบายสถานที่ ปัญหา และคนที่ได้รับผลกระทบ จากนั้นอธิบายว่าทางเลือกแต่ละแบบทำงานอย่างไร มีประโยชน์และข้อจำกัดอะไร ใช้ because บอกเหตุ ใช้ so บอกผล และใช้ could หรือ may เมื่อหลักฐานยังไม่พอสำหรับข้อสรุปที่แน่นอน
Listen for the problem, people, help and action
ฟังหาปัญหา ผู้ได้รับผลกระทบ ความช่วยเหลือ และการกระทำ
Review community places, services and people
ทบทวนสถานที่ บริการ และคนในชุมชน
Use opinions to choose a community idea
ใช้ความคิดเห็นเพื่อเลือกแนวคิดชุมชน
Evaluate an innovation for the community
ประเมินนวัตกรรมเพื่อชุมชน