My Experience, Strengths, and Career Plan
Build evidence from your experience, strengths and next step first.
สร้างหลักฐานจากประสบการณ์ จุดแข็ง และขั้นตอนถัดไปก่อน

Compare evidence, defend a direction and adapt the first 90 days when the conditions change.
Compare two career options with explicit criteria, distinguish evidence from assumptions, choose one direction, design an actionable 90-day plan and defend a revised decision after new constraints.
เปรียบเทียบทางเลือกอาชีพสองทางด้วยเกณฑ์ที่ชัด แยกหลักฐานจากข้อสันนิษฐาน เลือกทิศทาง วางแผน 90 วันที่ทำได้จริง และปรับการตัดสินใจเมื่อเงื่อนไขเปลี่ยน
For the learner: Career decisions involve values, evidence, uncertainty and trade-offs—not one perfect answer.
For the teacher: This mastery route integrates TF17 job language, listening, experience evidence and planning through evidence → comparison → response → action plan → changed constraint → retry.
บทนี้ฝึกตัดสินใจเรื่องอาชีพอย่างมีเหตุผล โดยมองทั้งรายได้ การเรียนรู้ ความเสี่ยง คุณค่า และข้อจำกัด แล้วแปลงการเลือกเป็นแผนปฏิบัติที่ตรวจสอบได้
Require a source for every important claim. A preference may guide the choice, but it must not be presented as verified evidence.
| Time | Teacher does | Student does | Required evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–3 | Frames decision quality. | Ranks four criteria. | Transparent priorities. |
| 3–8 | Provides option evidence. | Separates fact and unknown. | EVD record. |
| 8–13 | Challenges trade-offs. | Scores and qualifies options. | Defensible comparison. |
| 13–18 | Plays Matthew. | Restates and questions. | Accurate response. |
| 18–23 | Tests feasibility. | Builds 90-day plan. | Owner/timing/signal/fallback. |
| 23–30 | Plays Emma and scores. | Adapts, defends and retries. | EVD/ADAPT/FP. |
Feedback rule: Score the unsupported judgement. Give one success and one revision target; retry only the weakest 30–45 seconds.
skills · mentoring · future options
income · time · energy · risk
interest · values · work style
Choose four criteria, give each a weight from 1–3 and explain why your highest-weight criterion matters now.
Do not accept hidden criteria introduced only after a preferred option appears. Make priorities visible first.
| Criterion | Option A · current-company team lead | Option B · junior data role |
|---|---|---|
| Income | Stable pay; promotion route stated. | Lower first-year salary; exact review timing unknown. |
| Learning | Mentoring and leadership practice. | Formal technical training and new field. |
| Evidence of readiness | Current performance and internal knowledge. | Some spreadsheet experience; presentation skill gap. |
| Personal constraint | Low financial risk; limited challenge. | Evening study; four months of savings. |
Challenge phrases such as “better future” unless the learner names what is known and what remains uncertain.
Ask “Which criterion carries that judgement?” Do not force the higher numerical score if the learner can justify a decisive constraint.
I have two realistic options. The first is a team-leader role at my current company. It offers stable pay, mentoring and a clear promotion route, but it would keep me in work I no longer find challenging. The second is a junior data role with another company. It matches my long-term interest and includes formal training, but the first-year salary is lower and I would need to study in the evenings. I have savings for four months and some spreadsheet experience, although my presentation skills still need work.
Play once for the dilemma and once for evidence. Require a neutral restatement before recommendation.
| Period | Action | Success signal | Fallback |
|---|---|---|---|
| Days 1–30 | Confirm expectations; baseline one skill. | Written goal and first evidence sample. | Reduce scope; keep the key skill. |
| Days 31–60 | Complete one applied project with feedback. | Usable output and mentor review. | Smaller project or extra practice session. |
| Days 61–90 | Present results and decide the next development target. | Specific feedback and measurable improvement. | Extend deadline with evidence-based reason. |
Adapt every row to the chosen path. Name who supports each action and when progress will be checked.
Reject “learn more” as an action. Require an observable activity, timing, signal and fallback.
There is one important change. The data company has moved the start date forward by six weeks, so the evening course cannot be completed before the job begins. However, they will provide a mentor for the first three months. Your current company has also offered a temporary team-leader trial with no immediate pay increase. Decide whether this new evidence changes your choice, and revise the first ninety days of your development plan.
Target: 5/6 overall, FP = 2 and no zero after the focused retry.
Do not supply the revised decision. Score first, give one success and one revision target, then allow a focused retry.
© 2026 Engduo Thailand. This original lesson, AI-assisted cover and reviewed Amazon Polly audio are for authorised Engduo use. Do not copy, republish, sell, scrape or use them in another course, dataset, product or AI system without written permission, except where applicable law permits.
Build evidence from your experience, strengths and next step first.
สร้างหลักฐานจากประสบการณ์ จุดแข็ง และขั้นตอนถัดไปก่อน
Apply the career language in a professional role conversation.
นำภาษาอาชีพไปใช้ในบทสนทนาเรื่องบทบาทการทำงาน
Review a fast workplace update through listening.
ทบทวนอัปเดตในที่ทำงานผ่านการฟัง
Compare language for past ability and successful experience.
เปรียบเทียบภาษาความสามารถและความสำเร็จในอดีต